Narrow Results

In an attempt to make money markets safer and more resilient, regulators have created new requirements for market participants. Money market funds are now required to file a new N-CR form if a significant event occurs: for example, fund financial support or liquidity fees. We investigate whether fund stakeholders respond to the N-CR filings. We find that investors do not respond to the N-CR filings. However, fund managers, who do not need the filings to learn of the financial support, reduce the weighted average life (WAL) of the funds and increase the daily liquidity available. These actions have real costs and our results suggest the costs outweigh the benefit of the newly required Form N-CR (N-CR) filing.

Fitch Ratings has completed its first study of derivatives accounting and disclosure among corporate entities, excluding financial institutions. Derivatives have become an integral part of the risk management framework for major corporate issuers of debt, allowing active management of interest rate, foreign exchange, commodity price, and equity exposures. Moreover, the growing use of derivatives coincides with rapid developments in the derivatives market, including the availability of a broader range of derivative products. Fitch surveyed 57 global corporations to assess the types of derivatives used, accounting and financial reporting implications, and disclosure quality. This survey was intended to generate representative data only and is not necessarily reflective of the market as a whole. The paper presents the key findings and other important industry issues.

This paper examines the impact of the recently passed Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act on the behavior of market participants. Using the JOBS Act — which relaxed mandatory information disclosure requirements — as a natural experiment on firms’ choices of the mix of hard, accounting information and textual disclosures, we find that relative to a peer group of firms, initial public offering (IPO) firms reduce accounting disclosures and change textual disclosures. Because it allows a partial revelation of IPO quality, only textual disclosures affect underpricing. We also find that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) changes its behavior post-JOBS Act in responding to draft registration statements. Specifically, the SEC’s comment letters to firms are more negative in tone, and more forceful in their recommendations, focusing on quantitative information. Finally, under the JOBS Act, investors place more emphasis on the information produced by the SEC when pricing the stock. Returns following public release of the letters vary by about 4% based on letter tone.

The question of regulation in the domain of cryptocurrencies has been tackled in various ways, exhibiting therein a desire to strike a balance between fostering innovation and promoting oversight. This chapter examines the case of BitLicense, issued by the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), with the aim of contextualizing the relative merits of regulatory and oversight initiatives in the domain of cryptocurrencies. This includes an examination of the impact and critiques regarding BitLicense since its promulgation, along with the use of perspectives from public value theory (PVT) to contextualize the value creation efforts of the DFS using BitLicense as a regulatory instrument. The findings of the chapter suggest that contrasting views exist on the value creation of cryptocurrency regulations, and this is reflected both in a PVT approach as well as the evolving praxis of virtual currency regulatory and oversight efforts.