Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
Understanding the strategic mindset of the United States and China is essential, as their military behavior has significant global implications. The study employs a cultural approach to examine how historical, geographical, and ideological factors shape their strategic-military decisions. By addressing the central research question: how do the strategic cultures of the United States and China influence their preferences for using military force? This paper seeks to reveal the main differences in American and Chinese approaches to the use of military force. The time frame of analysis is limited to the 21st century, a period marked by China’s undeniable rise as a global power and the renewed significance of cultural theorizing in international relations scholarship. The findings underscore that the ideological underpinnings and operational behavior of both superpowers are pivotal in shaping their security perceptions and influencing patterns of military force application. By examining these elements, this study aims to enhance our understanding of how the distinct strategic mindsets of these superpowers impact their interactions on the global stage and inform their responses to various security challenges.
Chinese actions in the South China Sea are often viewed as proof of an assertive China, despite the Chinese claims that their Confucian values make China a peaceful power. This paper analyzes the South China Sea conflict through a prism of strategic culture theory and examines both the Chinese narrative on the conflict as well as the actual Chinese behavior in the area. Confucian norms and values provide a powerful rhetoric device utilized by the Chinese policymakers to legitimize the Chinese behavior to the domestic and to some extent also foreign audiences. However, the actual Chinese behavior rarely exhibits strong influences of Confucianism, suggesting that in actual behavior China acts in accord with realist predictions.