Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
This review article describes the contribution of Australian authors to the basic science and clinical management of flexor tendon injuries.
Introduction: This study aims to gain a better understanding of current practice for the surgical management and rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries in Australia, with the intent of establishing common guidelines for training of young surgeons.
Methods: A survey was distributed to the membership of the Australian Hand Surgery Society to determine whether a consensus could be obtained for: suture material and gauge; core and epitenon suture techniques; sheath and pulley management; and post-operative protocols for primary flexor tendon repair.
Results: The predominant materials used for core suture are TicronTM Suture (Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA) (34%) and EthibondTM Polyester Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (24%). The two core suture configurations commonly used are the Adelaide (45%) and Kessler (32%) repair. The predominant materials used for epitendinous sutures are 6-0 ProleneTM Polypropylene Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (56%), 5-0 ProleneTM (21%) and 6-0 EthilonTM Nylon Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (13%); and the majority (63%) use a running epitendinous technique. The management of critical pulleys is variable, with 89% prepared to perform some release of A2 and A4 pulleys. Rehabilitation protocols vary widely, with 24% of respondents using the same method for all patients, while 76% tailor their approach to each patient. Some component of active motion was used by most.
Discussion: There exists some consensus on the management of flexor tendon injuries in Australia. However, the management of critical pulleys and methods of post-operative rehabilitation remain varied. For the training of young surgeons, a majority advise a 3-0 gauge braided polyester core suture of four strands, combined with a 6-0 ProleneTM simple running epitendinous suture for increased tendon repair strength and smooth glide. Trainees should attempt to retain the integrity of the A2 and A4 pulleys. Post-operative rehabilitation should include a component of active flexion.
Background: The purpose of the present study was to assess the biomechanical strength and properties of a modified Krackow technique for side-to-side tendon repair with a short overlap length.
Methods: The flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum profundus, and flexor pollicis longus muscles were harvested from 10 fresh frozen cadavers. Overall, 60 tendon repairs were divided into four groups based on the suture technique: modified Krackow technique repair (KT); weave suture repair (WS); mattress suture repair (MS); and composite technique repair (CT), a combination of the modified Krackow and weave suture techniques. Single loading mechanical tests were performed, and the results for each suture technique were compared.
Results: Ultimate loads for KT, WS, MS, and CT were 155 ± 45 N, 122 ± 18 N, 92 ± 31 N, and 163 ± 22 N, respectively. KT and CT had significantly higher ultimate loads than the other groups. However, the difference between the KT and CT groups in terms of ultimate load was not significant.
Conclusions: Based on the results from the single loading tests, the use of the modified Krackow and composite techniques appeared to provide stronger fixation than that with the use of the weave and mattress sutures with a short overlap length.