It is an open problem whether Kirk’s σσ-invariant is the complete obstruction to a link map f:S2+∪S2−→S4f:S2+∪S2−→S4 being link homotopic to the trivial link. The link homotopy invariant associates to such a link map ff a pair σ(f)=(σ+(f),σ−(f))σ(f)=(σ+(f),σ−(f)), and we write σ=(σ+,σ−)σ=(σ+,σ−). With the objective of constructing counterexamples, Li proposed a link homotopy invariant ω=(ω+,ω−)ω=(ω+,ω−) such that ω±ω± is defined on the kernel of σ±σ± and which also obstructs link null-homotopy. We show that, when defined, the invariant ω±ω± is determined by σ∓σ∓, and is strictly weaker. In particular, this implies that if a link map ff has σ(f)=(0,0)σ(f)=(0,0), then after a link homotopy the self-intersections of f(S2+)f(S2+) may be equipped with framed, immersed Whitney disks in S4∖f(S2−) whose interiors are disjoint from f(S2+).