No Access

MACROSCOPIC OBSERVABLES AND THE BORN RULE, I: LONG RUN FREQUENCIES

N. P. LANDSMAN

Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics, and Particle Physics, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 Ed Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X08003511Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

We clarify the role of the Born rule in the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics by deriving it from Bohr's doctrine of classical concepts, translated into the following mathematical statement: a quantum system described by a noncommutative C*-algebra of observables is empirically accessible only through associated commutative C*-algebras. The Born probabilities emerge as the relative frequencies of outcomes in long runs of measurements on a quantum system; it is not necessary to adopt the frequency interpretation of single-case probabilities (which will be the subject of a sequel paper). Our derivation of the Born rule uses ideas from a program begun by Finkelstein [17] and Hartle [21], intending to remove the Born rule as a separate postulate of quantum mechanics. Mathematically speaking, our approach refines previous elaborations of this program — notably the one due to Farhi, Goldstone, and Gutmann [15] as completed by Van Wesep [50] — in replacing infinite tensor products of Hilbert spaces by continuous fields of C*-algebras. Furthermore, instead of relying on the controversial eigenstate-eigenvalue link in quantum theory, our derivation just assumes that pure states in classical physics have the usual interpretation as truthmakers that assign sharp values to observables.

Dedicated to the Memory of Bernd Kuckert (1968–2008)

Keywords:

AMSC: 81P15, 47L40

References

N. Bohr, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. A. Schilpp (Open Court, La Salle, 1949) pp. 201–241. Google Scholar
M. Born, Z. Phys. 38, 819 (1926). Google Scholar
O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson , Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Vol. II: Equilibrium States, Models in Statistical Mechanics ( Springer , Berlin , 1981 ) . Google Scholar
J. Bub , Interpreting the Quantum World ( Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
S. Bugajski and Z. Motyka, Int. J. Theor. Physics 20, 262 (1981). Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Cassinello and J. L. Sánchez-Gómez, Found. Phys. 26, 1357 (1996), DOI: 10.1007/BF02058273. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
C. Caves and R. Schack, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 315, 123 (2005), DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2004.09.009. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. Dickson, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2: Philosophy of Physics, eds. J. Butterfield and J. Earman (North-Holland, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007) pp. 275–415. Google Scholar
P. A. M. Dirac , The Principles of Quantum Mechanics ( Clarendon Press , Oxford , 1930 ) . Google Scholar
J. Dixmier , C*-Algebras ( North-Holland , Amsterdam , 1977 ) . Google Scholar
N. G. Duffield and R. F. Werner, Helv. Phys. Acta 65, 1016 (1992). Google Scholar
A. Einstein and M. Born , Briefwechsel 1916–1955 ( Langen Müller , München , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
E. M. R. A. Engel , A Road to Randomness in Physical Systems , Lecture Notes in Statistics 71 ( Springer-Verlag , Berlin , 1992 ) . Google Scholar
D. E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi , Quantum Symmetries on Operator Algebras ( Oxford University Press , Oxford , 1998 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone and S. Gutmann, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 192, 368 (1989), DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90141-3. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
T. L. Fine , Theories of Probability ( Academic Press , New York , 1978 ) . Google Scholar
D. Finkelstein, Trans. New York Acad. Sci. 25, 621 (1965). Google Scholar
D. Gillies , Philosophical Theories of Probability ( Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
R. Haag , Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras ( Springer-Verlag , Heidelberg , 1992 ) . Google Scholar
A. Hájek , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , ed. E. N. Zalta ( The Metaphysics Research Lab , 2003 ) , http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/probability-interpret/ . Google Scholar
J. B. Hartle, Am. J. Phys. 36, 704 (1968), DOI: 10.1119/1.1975096. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
W. Heisenberg , Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science ( Allen and Unwin , London , 1958 ) . Google Scholar
K. Hepp, Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237 (1972). Google Scholar
C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman and B. Spitters, A topos for algebraic quantum theory, v2 , arXiv:0709.4364 . Google Scholar
G. 't Hooft, The mathematical basis for deterministic quantum mechanics , arXiv:quant-ph/0604008 . Google Scholar
D. Howard, Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, eds. J. Faye and H. Folse (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994) pp. 201–229. Google Scholar
D. Howard, Philos. Sci. 71, 669 (2004), DOI: 10.1086/425941. Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose , Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras, Vol. 2: Advanced Theory ( Academic Press , New York , 1986 ) . Google Scholar
E. Kirchberg and S. Wassermann, Math. Ann. 303, 677 (1995), DOI: 10.1007/BF01461011. Web of Science, Google Scholar
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz , Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory , 3rd edn. ( Pergamon Press , Oxford , 1977 ) . Google Scholar
N. P. Landsman , Mathematical Topics Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics ( Springer-Verlag , New York , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
N. P. Landsman, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2: Philosophy of Physics, eds. J. Butterfield and J. Earman (North-Holland, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007) pp. 417–554. Google Scholar
J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg , The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 6: The Completion of Quantum Mechanics 1926–1941. Part 1: The Probabilistic Interpretation and the Empirical and Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics. 1926–1936 ( Springer-Verlag , New York , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
D. H. Mellor , Probability: A Philosophical Introduction ( Routledge , London , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
G. Morchio and F. Strocchi, J. Math. Phys. 28, 622 (1987), DOI: 10.1063/1.527649. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. von Neumann , Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik ( Springer-Verlag , Berlin , 1932 ) . Google Scholar
J. von Neumann, Compos. Math. 6, 1 (1938). Google Scholar
W. Ochs, J. Philos. Logic 6, 473 (1977), DOI: 10.1007/BF00262083. Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. Pauli, Z. Phys. 41, 81 (1927). ADS, Google Scholar
J. von Plato , Creating Modern Probability ( Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 1994 ) . Google Scholar
G. A. Raggio and R. F. Werner, Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 980 (1989). Google Scholar
S. Saunders, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 460, 1771 (2004). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
E. Scheibe , The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics ( Pergamon Press , Oxford , 1973 ) . Google Scholar
M. Schlosshauer and K. Camilleri, The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr's doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherence, v1 , arxiv:0804.1609 . Google Scholar
G. L. Sewell , Quantum Mechanics and its Emergent Macrophysics ( Princeton University Press , Princeton , 2002 ) . Google Scholar
E. Størmer, J. Funct. Anal. 3, 48 (1969). Google Scholar
W. Thirring , A Course in Mathematical Physics. Vol. 4: Quantum Mechanics of Large Systems ( Springer-Verlag , New York , 1983 ) . Google Scholar
T. Unnerstall, J. Math. Phys. 31, 680 (1990), DOI: 10.1063/1.528904. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
T. Unnerstall, Comm. Math. Phys. 130, 237 (1990), DOI: 10.1007/BF02473352. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
R. A. Van Wesep, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 321, 2438 (2006). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
D. Wallace, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34, 415 (2003), DOI: 10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00036-4. Web of Science, Google Scholar