Processing math: 100%
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    Types of irreducible divisor graphs of noncommutative domains

    In this paper, we introduce the notions of the directed, undirected, compressed directed, and compressed undirected irreducible divisor graphs Γ(x), G(x), Γc(x), and Gc(x) of a nonzero nonunit x in a noncommutative atomic domain D, respectively. In light of these notions, we identify the corresponding characterizations of the normal unique factorization domain (n-UFD). Moreover, we study the connection between the kinds of directed and undirected irreducible divisor graphs and an n-FFD. Consequently, these characterizations generalize the results of Coykendall and Maney [Irreducible divisor graphs, Comm. Algebra35(3) (2007) 885895] and Axtell et al. [Irreducible divisor graphs and factorization properties of domains, Comm. Algebra39(11) (2011) 41484162] to the noncommutative setting.

  • articleNo Access

    ON MAXIMAL NON-ACCP SUBRINGS

    A domain R is a maximal non-ACCP subring of its quotient field if and only if R is either a two-dimensional valuation domain with a DVR overring or a one-dimensional nondiscrete valuation domain. If R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension and S is a domain, then (R,S) is a residually algebraic pair. If S is a domain but not a field, a maximal non-ACCP subring extension R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension if (R,S) is a residually algebraic pair and R is quasilocal. Results with a similar flavor are given for domains R ⊂ S sharing a nonzero ideal, with applications to rings R of the form A + XB[X] or A + XB[[X]]. If R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension such that R is a domain and S is not (R-algebra isomorphic to) an overring of R, then R satisfies ACCP if and only if S satisfies ACCP.

  • articleNo Access

    WELL-CENTERED PAIRS OF RINGS

    Let R ⊂ S be an extension of integral domains. We say that (R, S) is a well-centered pair of rings, if each intermediate ring T between R and S is well-centered on R, in the sense that each principal ideal of T is generated by an element of R. The aim of this paper is to study well-centered pairs of rings. We investigate the structure of the intermediate rings T between R and S that are well-centered on R. We establish the relationship between well-centered pairs and normal pairs. We present some examples and counterexamples illustrating our theory and showing the limits of our results.

  • articleNo Access

    Atoms in quasilocal integral domains and Cohen–Kaplansky domains

    Let (R,M) be a quasilocal integral domain. We investigate the set of irreducible elements (atoms) of R. Special attention is given to the set of atoms in MM2 and to the existence of atoms in M2. While our main interest is in local Cohen–Kaplansky (CK) domains (atomic integral domains with only finitely many nonassociate atoms), we endeavor to obtain results in the greatest generality possible. In contradiction to a statement of Cohen and Kaplansky, we construct a local CK domain with precisely eight non-associate atoms having an atom in M2.