Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    Developing a Parental-Friendly Scoring System for Children with Congenital Hand Differences

    Background: Congenital hand differences (CHD) exhibit enormous diversity and heterogeneity. Surgeons and parents often have different concepts of severity, making things difficult during parental consultation. This study aims to align surgeon/parental views on the severity of the child’s CHD using a novel severity classification.

    Methods: Parents of affected children were asked to score the severity of their child’s abnormality pre- and post-consultation using a subjective scale (1–4) without any explanation. Furthermore, parents were asked to rate their concerns about the future function and appearance of their child’s hand condition using a similar scale of 1–4. They were then asked to rate the severity of the CHD post-consultation and three months post-operatively following explanation of the 4-point scale, as follows: 1 = treatment possible to normal; 2 = treatment possible to near normal; 3 = treatment possible but always some hand differences; 4 = treatment not possible. The surgeon also independently scored all children using his perception of the scale.

    Results: Forty-three children with a range of CHD were recruited into the sample. Linear weighted kappa analyses comparing inter-rater agreement showed no agreement between surgeon and parents during the initial scoring without any explanations. However, with explanations added, agreement rose significantly (kappa = 0.437 post-consultation and kappa = 0.706 three months post-op). No correlation was found between severity with both appearance and function (r = 0.277 and r = −0.184, respectively).

    Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the use of a simple scoring system was able to improve parental understanding of the severity and prognosis of CHD. The system demonstrated a good correlation between surgeon and parents. Such a scoring system can be easily utilised in the outpatient department to manage expectations and reduce anxiety.

  • articleNo Access

    Bilateral Dorsal Nail Curvature of the Thumb Distal Phalanx – A Case Report

    Congenital dorsal curvature of the distal phalanx has been previously described as ‘reverse Kirner’ or ‘ski-jump’ deformity. This report describes bilateral occurrence in the thumbs. A 13-year-old male presented with difficulty caring for his thumbnails and in picking up small objects. Examination showed dorsal curvature of the distal phalanges of both thumbs, with greater curvature of the right side. Radiographs showed wedge-shaped epiphyses and dorsal curvature without coronal plane deviation of the distal phalanges. There was objective and subjective decrease in function associated with lateral pinch and tripod grasp. The reported aetiopathogenesis for Kirner deformity cannot explain the observed dorsal curvature. The bilateral nature makes a secondary physeal cause unlikely and suggests an embryologic basis. Due to the noticeable deficits in function, operative intervention may be warranted.

    Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic)