Narrow Results

Posteroanterior radiographs of 102 normal wrists were studied to determine the morphological characteristics of the ulnar head associated with the value of ulnar variance. Ulnar variance, ulnar styloid length, ulnar head diameter, ulnar seat inclination, and the distance of ulnar head peak to the distal radioulnar joint were measured together with the third metacarpal length as a reference of the size of the wrist. Moderate correlation was confirmed not only between ulnar variance and ulnar seat inclination but also between ulnar variance and the distance of the ulnar head peak. Furthermore, we found a statistically significant correlation between ulnar variance and ulnar head diameter. The results showed that whole ulnar head configurations are affected by ulnar variance although there are considerable variations.

Twenty-six patients with mean age of 38.5 (range 18–59), from 1998 to 2005, with ulnar impaction syndrome who failed nonoperative treatments were included in our study. Patients' age, history of previous wrist fracture, presence of MRI signs and ulnar variance were recorded as variables. Also, patients' postoperative strength (compared to the contralateral wrist) and pain relief were collected as outcome measurements. Twenty-two patients (84.6%) had either good or excellent pain relief (median 4, range 1–4). Significant correlation was found between MRI findings and postop pain relief (r = 0.53, p ≤ 0.01). History of previous distal radius fractures was negatively correlated with pain relief (r = -0.50, p ≤ 0.01). No correlation was found between postop strength and any of the variables. Presence of MRI signs of UIS is a predictor of good outcome in arthroscopic wafer resection.

Background: This purpose of the study was to conduct a systematic review of available literature regarding the association between ulnar variance and outcomes after repair of peripheral traumatic tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).

Methods: A systematic literature search of the medical literature about peripheral tears of the TFCC was performed. We selected seven studies comparing clinical outcome and ulnar variance in patients with peripheral TFCC tears. We evaluated quality of the articles using both the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) and Sackett’s Level of Evidence (LOE). The outcomes were objective or self-assessment scoring systems for the function of the hand, wrist, or upper extremity.

Results: Seven articles were evaluated. The SEQES scores varied from 19 to 28, with a mean of 23. Five studies reported no association between ulnar variance and clinical outcome, and 2 studies reported an association. The studies reporting no association either excluded or did not mention the cases of unstable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

Conclusions: This systematic review did not demonstrate strong evidence regarding the association between ulnar variance and outcomes after TFCC repair. As most of the studies did not distinguish between capsular and foveal tears which can affect DRUJ stability, further studies looking at this point are necessary to determine whether ulnar shortening osteotomy has an added value for better outcomes after TFCC repair.

Background: Literature provides little and controversial evidence regarding the influence of ulnar variance (UV) on the incidence of scaphoid fractures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess UV in a large number of patients with acute scaphoid fracture in comparison to a control group of the same population.

Methods: During a two year period, 182 patients with acute scaphoid fractures (fracture group) and 182 ethnicity-, gender- and age-matched patients with wrist contusions (control group) were treated in three non-university hospitals. Using standardized digital wrist radiographs, UV values were measured by means of the method of perpendiculars by two independent examiners. The UV values of the fracture group were then compared to the UV values of the control group.

Results: Analyses of the agreement between the two raters resulted in a good to excellent inter-item correlation of 0.89, with a high intra-class coefficient of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–0.95). Mean (SD) UV value was -0.82 mm (1.77) in the fracture group and 0.27 mm (1.44) in the control group. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: According to this study, patients with scaphoid fractures are significantly more likely to show a negative UV than matched patients with wrist contusions.

Background: Palmar tilt and ulnar variance are crucial parameters for evaluating the distal radius. Identifying suitable reference points for these parameters on lateral wrist radiographs remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to establish reference points for measuring palmar tilt and ulnar variance on lateral wrist radiographs and to evaluate the reliability of these two parameters using the newly defined reference points.

Methods: The distal articular surfaces of 25 cadaver radii were marked at four different locations using thin wires. These bones were radiographed and constant landmarks were recorded. The reliability of the palmar tilt and ulnar variance measurements was assessed using the new reference points and two serial measurements recorded by three observers on 27 standardized lateral wrist radiographs.

Results: The reference points for palmar tilt on lateral radiograph were the dorsal and volar end points of the subchondral line. The subchondral line was connected to two of five metaphyseal cortical lines. The reference point for lateral ulnar variance was easily defined on the midpoint of the proximal aspect of the subchondral line. The corresponding posteroanterior central reference point for ulnar variance was at the ulnar corner of the subchondral line. Inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were overall good for the palmar tilt measurements, and excellent for the ulnar variance measurements.

Conclusions: Palmar tilt can be determined accurately with a good understanding of the radiographic landmarks on lateral radiographs, and by addressing the problems caused by ulnar inclination of the articular surface of the distal radius. Lateral wrist radiographs can provide a complete picture of the ulnar border of the radius for measuring ulnar variance.

Background: Positive ulnar variance (UV) may be associated with a higher incidence of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). However, neutral and/or negative UV has also been associated with the development of UIS; therefore, other risk factors may be involved. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological bone morphology in patients with UIS and asymptomatic controls.

Methods: Between 2009 and 2018, posteroanterior wrist radiographs of 47 wrists in 45 patients diagnosed with UIS were compared with those of 163 wrists in 93 asymptomatic patients from the control group. The following parameters were obtained: ulnar variance (UV); ulnar head top-fovea distance (UTFD); capitate–triquetrum distance (CTD); radio-lunate distance (RLD) and lunate coverage ratio (LCR). The morphology of the lunate was classified based on the absence (type I) or presence (type II) of a medial facet that articulates with the hamate. The radiographic parameters and lunate types were compared between the two groups. We then divided the groups into two subgroups: the positive UV subgroup and the neutral/negative UV subgroup. In each subgroup, the radiographic parameters and lunate types were compared between the UIS and control groups.

Results: In the UIS group, the UV and UTFD were significantly increased compared to those in the control group. The proportion of type II lunates was significantly higher in the UIS group than in the control group. In addition, the type II lunate was more common in the UIS group in both the positive UV and negative UV groups.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that in addition to positive UV, ulnar head morphology with an increased UTFD and type II lunate morphology may be associated with the development of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic)