The International Journal of Accounting

Synopsis

The research problem

This paper provides a semisystematic review of the literature on climate-related financial risk, with particular emphasis on whether that risk is adequately priced by financial markets and the implications of that risk assessment for financial reporting.

Motivation

This paper was motivated by a strong perception that financial markets have become increasingly exposed to the perils of climate change, and a concern for whether the rapid expansion of the literature on this topic sufficiently addresses financial markets’ correct pricing of the uncertainties inherent in these perils. Our particular goals were to understand the expansion of this literature, identify the originating and influential works that may have spurred this expansion, and provide new directions for research.

The research question

Our paper reviews the research on whether climate-related financial risk is adequately priced by the financial markets.

Target population

We examined a comprehensive sample of articles on climate-related financial risk published in the Financial Times’ Top 50 (FT50) accounting, finance, management, and business ethics journals over three decades, ending in 2022. Our analysis of the evolution of knowledge on climate-related financial risk also includes studies in non-FT50 journals (prior works) that may have spurred subsequent work in FT50 journals; non-FT50 journals (derivative works) that are inspired by the studies in FT50 journals; and set of studies that are similar to those in FT50 journals in terms of the topic (similar works) published in an array of non-FT50 journals.

Adopted methodology

We conducted a semisystematic review of knowledge flow based on bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and direct citation.

Analyses

We reviewed FT50 articles to examine the topics, methods, samples, and results. We compared FT50 articles with non-FT50 articles to explore their respective number of publications and average citations over time. We also examined the extent to which the FT50 and non-FT50 journals included accounting papers and the extent to which the top 20 papers, based on their impact (defined as the number of times a paper was considered an influential work by the FT50 journal papers), included accounting papers.

Findings

Compared to non-FT50 journals, we find that FT50 journals largely ignored climate-related financial risk until about 2010, and that the average citation of an FT50 publication was lower than a non-FT50 publication until around 2017. The fraction of FT50 and non-FT50 accounting journals publishing on climate-related financial risk remained low across all years. Moreover, the top 20 studies, based on their impact, included very few accounting papers. Our review of the content of the FT50 studies identifies traits of the literature that limit its generalizability, namely, a heavy emphasis on samples of U.S. corporations and the extensive use of association tests to develop the findings. Our review of the literature on the pricing effects of climate-related financial risk suggests that financial markets only partially price this risk and that fundamental questions relevant to policy remain unanswered.

In this discussion of [(), Climate-related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting” the International Journal of Accounting, this issue], I examine both the incremental contribution of their work and its limitations. Furthermore, I delve into the limitations inherent in the chosen research design strategy and discuss how these limitations may affect some of the documented findings, particularly those related to accounting research.

Synopsis

The research problem

In this study, we examined the effect of an important informal institution, namely, national culture, on audit fees in an international context.

Motivation

In recent years, extant literature has increasingly focused on country-level differences in the audit environment, as these might have a significant influence on how financial statement audits are conducted across the globe. We contribute to this stream of literature by investigating the impact of national culture on audit fees.

The test hypotheses

Based on the demand- and supply-side perspectives of audit fees, we hypothesized that national culture dimensions — namely, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus femininity — affect audit fees.

Target population

We used a sample of 27,670 firm-year observations across 22 countries over the 2002–2019 period.

Adopted methodology

We used ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions as baseline technique and entropy-balanced method (EBM) and system-generalized method of moments (GMM) to address endogeneity concerns.

Analyses

We examined the impact of Hofstede’s four national culture dimensions — uncertainty avoidance, power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus femininity — on audit fees. We also tested the robustness of results using alternative measures of national culture, subsample analyses, and additional firm-level factors.

Findings

Consistent with our hypotheses, we find that audit fees are higher (lower) in countries with higher uncertainty avoidance, individualism, and masculinity (power distance) scores. Our further analyses reveal that earnings management proxied by abnormal accruals does not impact the relationship; however, country-level creditor rights influence audit fees in high power distance and masculine cultures. We also note that national culture influences auditor choice and audit opinion. Our main findings are robust to alternate proxies and subsample analysis, as well as to address potential endogeneity concerns. Overall, our findings offer important implications for firms operating in global markets and for the audit profession.

Synopsis

The research problem

The purpose of this study was to examine the market reaction to sell-side analyst recommendation revisions issued under an integrated reporting (IR) approach.

Motivation

Advocates of this corporate reporting approach argue that IR enhances capital markets’ information environment by rendering investors better able to assess the value creation process of a firm. Recent empirical studies corroborate this argument. Considering the central role of financial intermediaries, we investigated whether the informativeness of analyst recommendation revisions is associated with the adoption of IR and the quality of integrated reports.

The test hypotheses

We tested whether the informativeness of analyst recommendation revisions decreases or increases after the mandatory adoption of an IR approach. Furthermore, we tested whether the informativeness is negatively or positively related to the quality of the released integrated report after the mandatory adoption of an IR approach.

Target population

We focused on the South African capital market, which is the only setting where IR is mandated. We utilized a sample of 3,201 recommendation revisions made within a 3-year window around the mandatory IR adoption.

Adopted methodology

This study used ordinary least square (OLS) regressions and applied difference-in-differences as well as instrumental variable approaches.

Analyses

We modeled the market reaction to the recommendation revisions as a function of the period in which the recommendations are announced (i.e., pre- or post-adoption), along with other factors affecting market reaction. In subsequent tests, we also modeled the market reaction to the recommendation revisions as a function of the quality of a firm’s integrated report.

Findings

We found strong evidence that analysts’ revisions exhibited economically and statistically significantly lower information content under IR. Moreover, we found that upgrades and downgrades issued in the post-adoption period were less informative when issued for firms with high-quality integrated reports. Overall, results showed that the benefit of acquiring advice from analysts became more marginal under an IR approach.

Synopsis

The research problem

This study examined the effect of having debt contracts that contain balance sheet covenants on the decision to make seasoned equity offerings (SEOs).

Motivation

Prior studies examined the determinants of equity issuance without considering private debt contracts that contain balance sheet covenants. Generally, firms are not restricted from stock issuance when they have financial debt covenants. This might motivate firms to make SEOs when they are more susceptible to balance sheet debt covenant violations. Making SEOs increases firms’ equity capitals in the short term and, therefore, has the direct effect of improving balance sheet covenants in the current period. This effect motivated this study to examine whether firms are more likely to conduct SEOs when their debt contracts include more-restrictive balance sheet covenants.

The test hypothesis

The hypothesis of the study is in the null form, which states that balance sheet covenant restrictiveness is unrelated to the probability of conducting SEOs.

Target population

The target population includes shareholders, debtholders, and firm managers.

Adopted methodology

Panel data estimation was used, specifically, the fixed effects model.

Analyses

The empirical analysis was conducted on a unique sample of UK listed firms with private debt covenants that is hand-collected from annual reports. Equity issuance in the sample is based on private placements, which are a common type of SEO in the UK. The restrictiveness of balance sheet-based covenants is defined as the number of balance sheet covenants in a loan contract or the tightness of net worth covenant slack.

Findings

The results show that balance sheet covenant restrictiveness is positively associated with the probability of conducting SEOs through private placements. The baseline result is robust to the application of a number of the controls often used in the literature, including cash shortage, the use of balance sheet covenants in the previous loan contract, earnings management, and the quality of external governance. It is also robust to excluding the financial crisis period and addressing potential endogeneity concerns using a propensity score-matching procedure. Additionally, further analysis provides some evidence that equity issuance by firms with more-restrictive balance sheet covenants is negatively associated with future operating performance, suggesting that these firms may not efficiently use the raised capital.