The International Journal of Accounting

Synopsis

The research problem

Prior empirical research on constituents’ participation in setting international accounting standards has focused on their decision whether or not to participate directly in the standard setter’s due process. However, because that focus neglects constituents’ choice between direct participation and indirect participation via an intermediary, we investigated the determinants of using an indirect method of participation as a substitute for, or in complement to, direct participation.

Institutional setting

We exploited the European institutional setting, where the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) serves as an intermediary for indirect participation in the due process of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

The test hypotheses

Based on rational choice theory, we hypothesized that constituents from EFRAG’s inner circle and from countries with smaller capital markets, lower English-language proficiency, and/or an accounting value profile more different from that embodied in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have a higher probability of choosing to use indirect participation.

Adopted methodology

Using a sample of 7,766 comment letters (CLs) from 2005–2017, we focused on individual constituents and traced their use of indirect participation (i.e., sending CLs to EFRAG) versus direct participation (i.e., sending CLs to the IASB). We employed logistic regression models using the methods of participation as dependent variable to test our hypotheses. Controlling for factors used in prior research on direct participation, we estimated a primary model for the full sample of constituents and a secondary model with firm-specific variables for the subsample of constituents classified as corporate preparers.

Findings and implications

We found strong evidence that the constituents’ membership in EFRAG’s inner circle is positively related, and capital market size in the constituents’ home countries is negatively related, to choosing to use indirect participation. Country-level English-language proficiency and differences in the accounting value profile in relation to IFRS also determine the choice of participation method. Our findings suggest that a preference for indirect participation relates to the barriers to using direct participation. We provide initial evidence of a neglected aspect of s () rational choice model and implications for EFRAG’s role as an intermediary.

Synopsis

The research problem

Taiwanese stock markets practice a unique form of reporting frequency, combining quarterly interim financial reports with mandatory monthly sales announcements. This unique setting allows us to compare the information content of quarterly earnings that are announced before, bundled with, or announced after the monthly sales disclosures.

Motivation

Monthly sales disclosures likely contribute to the pricing of earnings announcements (EAs) by providing investors with valuable information that helps them revise their expectations when forecasting earnings and cash flows. We examine whether monthly sales disclosures help investors to process earnings information.

The test hypotheses

Our first hypothesis is that the immediate market response to earnings news is lower if the previous quarter’s EAs are disclosed after the reporting of monthly sales for the first month of the next quarter. Our second hypothesis is that the subsequent market response to earnings news is lower if the previous quarter’s EAs are disclosed after the reporting of monthly sales for the first month of the next quarter.

Target population

We studied a sample of Taiwanese listed firms from 2014 through 2018.

Adopted methodology

We used multivariate regressions to test the hypotheses.

Analyses

We examined the monthly sales disclosures for the first month of quarter $q+1$, which are released within the first 10 days of the second month of quarter $q+1$. We analyze the pricing of the content of the earnings of quarter q, conditional on whether the earnings are released before, simultaneously with, or released after the monthly sales disclosures.

Findings

We found that earnings disclosed after the monthly sales news are associated with weaker EA returns and post-EA drift, relative to earnings disclosed before or bundled with the monthly sales news. These results suggest that monthly sales disclosures preempt the information content of late EAs. More importantly, we found that late EAs are associated with less positive correlation between EA returns and post-EA returns than early and bundled EAs. Overall, these results suggest that by providing timely sales information, monthly sales disclosures improve the information environment.

Synopsis

The research problem

This paper examined whether firms’ decision to switch from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to the new Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (New UK GAAP) affects their audit fees.

Motivation

The New UK GAAP was introduced by the UK regulators to enhance the comparability of financial reports and to reduce the high financial reporting costs associated with IFRS. We aimed to provide evidence on whether the reduced frameworks of IFRS, like the New UK GAAP, are a more cost-effective option. Furthermore, only very few studies analyzed the impact of abandoning IFRS on audit fees, and these found inconsistent results using the public firm data. We aimed to extend the current literature by using the private firm data.

The test hypotheses

Our first set of hypotheses considered whether the switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP is associated with audit fees. Our second hypothesis tested whether there is a difference in any such association between larger and smaller firms.

Target population

We focused on the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firms that have previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS.

Adopted methodology

We used regression analyses, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses, various matching methods for robustness, and analyses of firms’ financial reports.

Analyses

Using the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firm data for the period 2014–2019, we examined the impact of switching from IFRS to the New UK GAAP on audit fees. The data for regression and DID analyses were obtained from the FAME database. We also downloaded the financial reports of two firms from Companies House to analyze the differences in their reports before and after the switch to the New UK GAAP.

Findings

We found that firms’ decision to switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP significantly reduced their audit fees, with larger firms experiencing an additional reduction in their audit fees following the switch. Through examining the real examples of firms’ financial reports, we found consistent evidence that firms turning away from IFRS did take advantage of the disclosure exemptions contained within the New UK GAAP, resulting in reduced disclosure, which may explain the reduced audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that using full IFRS may still be burdensome for the sampled firms that previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. The findings also imply that an accounting standard consistent with IFRS but requiring less disclosure, such as the New UK GAAP or the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities, may be welcomed by practitioners and represents a useful alternative for standard setters.

Synopsis

The research problem

This study examined whether and how top management team (TMT) fault lines formed by diversity and division affect stock price crash risk (hereafter, crash risk).

Motivation

Prior studies have documented how a single characteristic or the demographic diversity of managers affects real economic activities. However, TMT fault lines, formed by the structure of executives’ demographic diversity, remain untapped in crash risk research. Given the potential monopoly of the TMT on information, it is important to determine whether TMT fault lines influence the distribution of bad news. This study therefore explored how TMT fault lines reduce crash risk through the private leakage of bad news by subgroups and the moderating role of analysts in this process.

The test hypotheses

We hypothesized that firms with a strong TMT fault line have low stock price crash risk. Moreover, subgroups divided by TMT fault lines have a greater chance of leaking bad news when firms are followed by more analysts, thereby reducing the stock price crash risk to a greater extent.

Target population

We examined 19,228 annual observations of Chinese publicly listed firms from 2008 to 2021.

Adopted methodology

We applied ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and moderation analysis to our study.

Analyses

We evaluated the microgovernance factors affecting crash risk from a novel perspective — internal TMT conflict. First, we performed regression analysis on a sample of Chinese publicly listed firms to determine whether TMT fault lines reduce crash risk and the effect of analysts on this relationship. Second, we performed cross-sectional variation tests for the main regression. Finally, we investigated the effect of a CEO-CFO coalition on crash risk, given that the unequal status of subgroups may reduce the monitoring capacity of any subgroup in a weaker position.

Findings

We found that TMT task-related fault lines are negatively associated with crash risk and positively moderated by analysts. Meanwhile, the TMT biodemographic fault lines do not have a significant influence on crash risk. We also demonstrated that the monitoring effect of TMT task-related fault lines is stronger when external governance is weaker. Finally, additional analysis implies that the monitoring effect of a CEO-CFO coalition fault line remains effective, but this effect is weaker.