![]() |
Since its inception 50 years ago, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, also called ESR or EMR) has become a major tool in diverse fields ranging from biology and chemistry to solid state physics and materials science. This important book includes personal descriptions of early experiments by pioneers who laid the foundations for the field, perspectives on the state of the art, and glimpses of future opportunities. It presents a broad view of the foundations of EPR and its applications, and will therefore appeal to scientists in many fields. Even the expert will find here history not previously recorded and provocative views of future directions.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_fmatter
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0001
The golden jubilee of the Dutch Physical Society in April 1971 was concluded with a lecture by Samuel Goudsmit on the history of the discovery of the electron spin. Actually, his could hardly be called a polished lecture; it was a grandiose artistic performance, full of wit and emotional involvement. Goudsmit, then at the end of his scientific career, gave a very personal account of how chance and the guidance by Ehrenfest, their far-sighted supervisor, led him and Uhlenbeck to formulate their remarkable discovery. When, in connection with the present book the question came up how to discuss the early history of electron spin, my thoughts returned to that day, nearly twenty-five years ago, when I had been impressed by Goudsmit's truly humane wisdom. After weighing various alternatives I thought: why not let the master speak for himself?…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0002
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0003
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0004
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0005
In 1944 Assistant Professor of Kazan State University Evgeny K. Zavoisky detected for the first time the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance absorption in paramagnetic substances. In these experiments, he used manganese and copper sulfates, and anhydrous chromium chloride. E. K. Zavoisky was inspired by Gorter's experiments on paramagnetic relaxation in solid paramagnetic salts. However, he replaced the calorimetric detection method, which was used by C. J. Gorter, by a sensitive electronic method - the method of grid current. For the success of Zavoisky's experiment it was also very important that he decided to apply a low frequency modulation of an external magnetic field.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0006
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0007
The collaboration of three Kazan physicists: E.K. Zavoisky, S.A. Al'tshuler and B.M. Kozyrev, should be mentioned in the context of the history of the electron paramagnetic resonance discovery. Zavoisky investigated the effect of the high frequency electromagnetic field on substances back in the thirties. At that time he invited physical-chemist B.M. Kozyrev and a bit later theorist S.A. Al'tshuler, who were acquainted with him since his studying in Kazan University, to participate in this work. Their collaboration led to a close friendship that lasted for life.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0008
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0009
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0010
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0011
Harvard University housed a distinguished group of faculty in the Department of Physics and in the Division of Engineering and Applied Physics who had made numerous seminal contributions to magnetic resonance spectroscopy by 1957, the year of my arrival in the Chemistry Department as a freshman Instructor. Among these faculty, Professors G. Benedek, N. Bloembergen, R. V. Pound, E. M. Purcell, N. F. Ramsey, and J. H. van Vleck come quickly to mind. (R. L. Orbach had yet to arrive at Harvard from the Clarendon Laboratories of Oxford University. He was appointed Assistant Professor of Applied Physics at Harvard in 1961.)…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0012
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0013
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0014
In the mid-fifties, chemists had already discovered NMR (1) and were beginning to exploit this phenomenon, although it would be many years before it was to become the standard analytical tool that it is today. But there were few taking advantage of ESR despite the fact that it was invented (2) before NMR (3) and was techincally easier to utilize. Of course, Bleaney (4) had already outlined the field of ESR in his work on transition metals, but soon thereafter chemists (5,6) led by the distinguished work of Sam Weissman (5), took advantage of this tool and applied it to organic free radicals as well as to inorganic complexes.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0015
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0016
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0017
This chapter deals with some of the early magnetic resonance studies of rates and pathways of exchanges, either via electron transfer or atom transfer, between paramagnetic and diamagnetic molecules. The cited examples are of systems at equilibrium. The average concentrations of the species involved are constant but are accompanied by the fluctuations about the average that are an inevitable consequence of the stochastic nature of dynamic equilibrium.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0018
This chapter is concerned with one radical species only, the thianthrene cation radical, Th+. I shall recount the history of the discovery of the structure of Th+ not only because it illustrates how EPR was used successfully after initial uncertainties and errors, but also because Th+, with its structure known, was able to play an important role later in studies of reactions of aromatic cation radicals with nucleophiles. I shall not go into those studies, however…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0019
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0020
I did my graduate research at the California Institute of Technology during 1947-1950. This was followed by postdoctoral research in the Physics Department of the University of Chicago, in the research group of Robert Mulliken, during 1950-52. Although I was keenly interested in the problem of the electronic structures of molecules, I was highly skeptical of the utility of both Pauling's valence bond theory and Mulliken's molecular orbital theory by the time I left Chicago. There was not one single experimental observable for “large” molecules (> diatomic) that could be used to test the various theoretical approximations. Theoretical calculations of bond dissociation energies were of little value, since they are differences between large numbers, each of which had uncertainties of the order of the dissociation energy itself. Excited state energies were particularly uncertain because of strong configuration interaction. Electric dipole moment calculations were uncertain, since they are sensitive to the long tails of wave functions, which were not known accurately. There were of course many hand-waving theories of chemical phenomena, but the overall picture was quite discouraging to me. In the early 1950's the central question was--were these theories of the electronic structures of molecules on the right track? Were they even approximately correct? Paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy did answer these questions in the affirmative and provided much impetus to further development and fruitful application of molecular electronic structure theory…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0021
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0022
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0023
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0024
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0025
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0026
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0027
Almost ten years elapsed following Zavoiski's discovery of the ESR phenomenon before the methodology was applied to the study of irradiated biomaterials. In 1954 Combrisson and Uebersfeld published a report of an ESR signal obtained from irradated glycine among other irradiated amino acids and carbohydrates (1). Shortly thereafter Professor Gordy took up the study of irradated biomaterials at Duke University (2). Gordy introduced a long succession of graduate students to this field of investigation. I became acquainted with several of his students and postdoctorals at American Physical Society meetings, particularly Howard Shields, Ichiro Miyagawa and Chester Alexander Jr. The springtime APS meetings held in Washington are especially memorable. It was a pleasant time of year in the capital city and Gordy's group always helped to make the meeting more interesting…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0028
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0029
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0030
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0031
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0032
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0033
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0034
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0035
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0036
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0037
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0038
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0039
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0040
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0041
Most chemistry textbooks treat free radicals as transient reactive species, so it was surprising to GRE (then an undergraduate student) that William N. Lipscomb suggested that Alex Kaczmarczyk might have produced a stable radical of a boron hydride in 1961. This hypothesis, which turned out to be wrong, led to a particularly memorable visit to Gus Maki's lab to search for an EPR signal. Later, while serving in the Navy GRE was perplexed by Chemical Abstracts entries about “spin sounds.” Since the original articles were not accessible then, it took some time to realize that this was a mis-translation of the French sonde! The next exposure to EPR came in an assignment as a first-year graduate student to develop, at the initiative of Richard Holm, new undergraduate laboratory exercises that combined synthesis of substituted quinones, electrochemical generation of the semiquinone radicals, and EPR. This was done on the first Varian E3. One day, while browsing in the MIT library, all of these pieces came together when an article about nitroxyl radicals was found serendipitously. This happened about the time that GRE met SSE, also a graduate student at MIT, and we got manied. We developed the idea of making complexes that included nitroxyl radicals in ligands to paramagnetic transition metals (1). If our proposal to work on this as part of our Ph.D. thesis work had been accepted, the work probably would have stopped when we graduated. However, the proposal was rejected as not worth working on, so we could only think and plan for the future. We came to the University of Denver in part because the school was willing to invest in an EPR spectrometer for someone who was not an EPR spectroscopist. Our research program owes a lot to Dwight M. Smith, the Chairman of the Department, who believed in our quest, and gave support at critical junctures…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0042
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0043
E. Zavoisky started the field of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) in 1945 (1). About a year later Bloch et al. (2) and Purcell et al. (3) independently developed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)1. A decade later Electron Nuclear Double Resonance (ENDOR) was developed (6,7). ENDOR essentially combines both NMR and EPR and thus can be viewed as an extension of both techniques, in which the advantages of each are being utilized. As we are celebrating the 50th anniversary of Zavoisky's seminal work and he unfortunately is no longer among us to tell his story it might be of interest to tell the origin of ENDOR, which may be considered an extension of his work.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0044
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0045
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0046
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0047
An acronym RYDMR (reaction-yield-detected magnetic resonance) proposed by E. Frankevich (1) is now used to denote methods for recording the EPR spectra of short-lived spin-correlated pairs of paramagnetic particles based on the influence of resonant microwave (mw) radiation on the yield of the reaction products of these pairs. Spin-correlated pairs arise from a precursor of a given spin multiplicity (e.g. from a singlet or triplet excited molecule) and acquire this multiplicity upon formation. In the RYDMR method a concept “reaction yield” is used in a general sense to denote any change in the system due to pair reaction. This can be the yield of final or intermediate reaction products, the intensity of excited product luminescence, the electrical conductivity of a sample, the nuclear polarization of reaction product, etc…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0048
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0049
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0050
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0051
In 1961 a unique laboratory was brought by V.V. Voevodsky from the Semenov Institute in Moscow to Siberia to the Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion. In this laboratory physical chemists (researchers) were mixed with engineers, specialists in electronics, and theoretical physicists. The laboratory was prepared to solve various problems chemical physics, particularly in the highly professional environment of colleagues from the other Institutes of young Novosibirsk Akademgorodok…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0052
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0053
My first encounter with what was going to grow into Fourier transform EPR occurred, in retrospect, very early in my graduate studies with Professor Larry Kevan at Wayne State University. I arrived in his lab at the beginning of August 1971. Larry suggested, that in the month before classes started, I see what I could do with the saturation recovery bridge that someone else had started to put together before switching to a more productive project. The aim was to see if the T1 of trapped electrons in alkaline ice glasses or hydrogen atoms in acid glasses could tell something about the structure of the traps. There was much interest in the trapped or solvated electron then not only from its role in radiolysis, but also from its interaction with the solvent as the simplest of anions. I started with a V153C klystron as a power source and a Philco-Ford waveguide diode switch as a modulator and a Varian V-line cavity as resonator and by the end of the month recorded my first saturation recovery curve. I then proceeded to make a few trivial improvements in my bridge and it did not function for another two years…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0054
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0055
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0056
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0057
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0058
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0059
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0060
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0061
The following sections are included:
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0062
It is widely accepted that the upper sensitivity limit in conventional (CW X-band) ESR is 1010 electron spins. There are two basic reasons for this relatively small sensitivity: The first one is the small thermal population difference. The second reason is the fact that low energy photons are detected which leads to small detector efficiency and to relatively high thermal noise level. While optical photons can be detected with an efficiency near unity, many microwave photons are required to exceed the noise level. In the first part of this chapter, a very brief and partial description of the different solutions to the sensitivity problem will be given…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_0063
Many scientific fields become senescent and of mere historical interest 50 years after the initial discovery. EPR at 50 years, however, is only approaching adolescence. To look forward a bit to what EPR will develop into, let us first look for patterns from the past that continue today. In many of the contributions to this book three themes recur: personal communication, advances in instrumentation, and collaborations between spectroscopists and people with difficult problems…
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812816764_bmatter
The following sections are included: